Google Accuses Microsoft of Resorting to Patents When "Products Stop Succeeding"
Microsoft is using patents as a crutch when its technologies fail in the market. This is what a Google patent lawyer has implied, pointing out how Microsoft is almost bleeding Android smartphone manufacturers hundreds of millions each year from licensing royalties.

In an interview with the San Francisco Chronicle, Google counsel Tim Porter criticizes Microsoft’s attacks on Linux, particularly by putting the squeeze on Microsoft corporate customers who deploy a mixed Linux and Windows environment. Google thinks that Microsoft is heavily resorting on patents when its products become irrelevant in the market, pointing to how the company lost the smartphone dominance previously held by Windows Mobile, and how Microsoft has been late in the game with its Windows Phone platform.
When their products stop succeeding in the marketplace, when they get marginalized, as is happening now with Android, they use the large patent portfolio they’ve built up to get revenue from the success of other companies’ products.
Google says that the current patent system is broken, referring to how software technologies can be patented. Instead, Porter says there are arguments that copyright protection is “more appropriate” for the software industry. It’s interesting to note that Google is in the same position as Microsoft was in the early 1990′s. Back then, Microsoft founder Bill Gates wrote that “the industry would be at a complete standstill” if software were eligible for patent protection. He said that “some big company will patent some obvious thing [and] take as much of our profits as they want.”
This is exactly what Microsoft is now doing, by enforcing its technology patents on Android smartphone manufacturers. Microsoft is reportedly able to earn as much as $5 per handset, which translates to more than $400 million per year in licensing deals from about 50% of all Android phone makers. Microsoft has said this was only fair, since they own certain technologies used in Android and that Google should stop whining about having to pay royalties.
Has Microsoft lost its edge? It has already made some major missteps in the mobile industry, such as by cancelling its Courier tablet platform prematurely, even as Apple was just launching the first iPad in 2010. Nokia’s Lumia 800 and 710 Windows Phones are about to be released later this month, but amid soaring sales of the Apple iPhone, and Android’s smartphone market growing, is an “Android tax” all that Microsoft has to resort to in order to survive and remain relevant?
Credit: Source.New Report Suggests Microsoft Knew All Along Its Windows Phone Devices Aren’t Always Faster Than Android, iPhone
Microsoft Developers Reportedly Working With Instagram to Bring Popular Photo Sharing Service to the WP7 Platform
Android User & His Galaxy Nexus Beat Windows Phone 7 In Speed Test, Microsoft Store Refuses To Payout $100
IHS iSuppli, Gartner, IDC Agree That Microsoft's Windows Phone 7 Platform Likely to Surpass Apple iPhone by 2015; Android to Remain in #1 Spot
What Settlement Talks, Samsung Countersues Apple with New Patent Infringement Allegations, 2 FRAND Patents Included
Sahas Katta Has Confirmed Receiving The Laptop & Phone Bundle From Microsoft, Announces They Will Both Be Auctioned For Charity

If Google can’t come up with it’s own ideas and uses somebody else’s patented ideas, a license needs to be paid to the patent holder. Google just wants to use everyone elses ideas (tech, desgins, copywrited works, etc.) to benefit their spam engine.
Software patents rulings are a joke. If the same was applied to hardware, glue, pins, glass and plastic would all be patented.
Bor-ring! How ridiculous is the this article, I can’t believe I wasted my precious time reading it! Microsoft can do what it pleases when it comes to protecting it’s IP. As they say in programming circles, Google’s lawyer is a NO-OP.
Your joking right. Google is not making money on android. It’s on ads, and copying is what everyone dose to make a it better. Even Microsoft dose it. So I don’t see your point.
Companies spend millions developing a technology and Google simply wants to copy them n use for free. I think the biggest copycat is google. No wonder they could not make android without iOS already in the market or Google+ before Facebook/Twitter. Google always buys companies n products like youtube, Android etc and integrate it with their account . but never develop anything on their own and if they develop or upgrade anything it breaks…like the current search algorithm.
And I also think the people should start writing the truths rather than their opinions…like the last paragraph in this article or the title may have read “Google wants to copy patented software for free”