Sony Accidentally Ends PS3 Supercomputing [Sony's Removal Of The OtherOS Feature Prematurely Ends PS3 Supercomputer Clusters]

Sony recently patched-out the “OtherOS” feature that allowed users to run Linux installations on their first-gen PlayStation 3 consoles. The Linux crowd hasn’t taken kindly, sending moronic commentators to our blog and filing a class action lawsuit. Sony allegedly did it to preserve the security and DRM environment on the PS3, but they’ve inadvertently hampered the growing scene of clustered-PS3 supercomputers.

PS3 Supercomputer Cluster

The PlayStation 3 uses the “Cell” processor, a powerful microprocessor which was codeveloped by IBM, Sony and Toshiba. The PlayStation 3 (even when it launched at $600) was vastly cheaper than any Cell-powered custom supercomputer could hope to be, so some universities, research institutions and even the US Air Force have created cheap Cell supercomputer clusters by networking thousands of PS3s together.

It was a cheap (and awesome) way for budget-strapped universities (and US military branches, apparently) to get their hands on a Cell-powered supercomputer. Unfortunately, these clusters all used the OtherOS feature and when Sony removed them from the PS3′s firmware, that destroyed the future of any PS3 supercomputers, according to experts who spoke to Hot Hardware.

Hot Hardware spoke to several researchers and computer scientists, including Dr. Frank Mueller, the first man to build a PS3 supercomputer cluster. A majority of them believe that the PS3 Supercomputer era is dead. Not only did Sony hamper it by removing the “OtherOS” feature, but the second-gen “PlayStation 3 Slim” never had the firmware to use the OtherOS feature.

Apparently, all of these PS3 supercomputer clusters were all connected to the internet and all got the firmware update that removed the OtherOS feature. According to Hot Hardware, all of these PS3 clusters (including the Air Force and their 2,000 consoles) are now useless (or back to being game consoles anyway).

Hot Hardware says that Sony knew who the clustered supercomputing clients were, and could have avoided giving them the firmware update, but al la – Sony has killed them all.

IBM is now offering cheaper Cell-based supercomputers than they were several years ago, but those in the academic space say that nothing could beat the clustered PS3′s in the FLOPS per price ratio.

Source
You may also like:
Latest TFTS Headline News in
(TFTS has 4294 articles in this category)
  • gsgflash

    Nowhere does it say in your source that supercomputer clusters accidentally updated and are now useless. Seems like you’re making a bunch of assumptions here.

  • Kevin Schram

    Fixed.

  • BigZ

    In my view Sony sucked prior to the PS3, an opinion I formed from experiences others had with Sony products. But after the PS3 I thought for once maybe I should re-access my opinion of the Sony brand. But after having purchased a PS3 and seeing it get dwindled down slowly through updates, that remove more and more functionality I have come to realize I was wrong, and Sony still sucks, and I will need to continue not buying Sony products after all.

    ps: This will affect my purchasing of games also. I have not updated my PS3, and I can tell you right now that I will not buy any games that support PS3 updates greater than v3.21.

  • Richard Rickman

    HaHa, I call bullshit, no way were those clusters automatically updated. Sony requires each PS3 to download the update manually, then you have to agree to the new trems of use & accept the OtherOS removal through a prompt. You are full of it man.

    • Kevin Schram

      @Richard Rickman

      Yeah, and I edited that point out.

  • yourName

    How would Sony know about everyone who made a PS3 cluster? Any two PS3s on a LAN constitute a cluster, and I certainly haven’t registered for special treatment from Sony.

    I don’t see how there’s anything “accidental” about this. Sony felt that using Open Platform feature was a threat, and chose to remove the feature, at the expense of upsetting a niche of their userbase.

    I don’t use the triangle button very often, I can only imagine that a later patch will turn off my triangle button.

    • Kevin Schram

      @yourName

      Thanks for leaving a fake e-mail. I’m only humoring myself with a reply, but…

      Do you think that maybe Sony would know who these clustered supercomputers where through their orders? These universities and institutions were ordering thousands of PlayStation 3s directly from Sony. Sony definitely knew who they were. They weren’t just going to Best Buy and laying down the plastic, bud.

  • anonymous coward

    The phrase is “could have” not “could of.”

  • dnm

    Any website/blog/newszine/whatever that passes itself off as a news source, but can’t differentiate ‘could of’ and ‘could have’ is not worth reading.

  • anthony

    You said “could of.”

  • Kevin Schram

    Even the big tech blogs occasionally make grammatical mistakes.

    Fixed anyhow.

  • Wesley

    “Hot Hardware says that Sony knew who the clustered supercomputing clients were, and could have avoided giving them the firmware update, but al la – Sony has killed them all.”

    It doesn’t seem likely that they could have targeted certain PS3′s to not get the update.
    And besides, It says in the new EULA that if you don’t want to update, its fine, you just cant access PSN

    • Kevin Schram

      @Wesley

      If I recall, the debug PS3s (used for game development and gaming journalism) are on a completely different firmware cycle than the retail units.

      Ergo, Sony knows who’s running a regular PS3 and who’s not. To further my point from before, most of these institutions ordered large amounts of consoles, so Sony knew who they were.

  • Dave

    Surely, Sony have the option of reversing its decision to disable the feature, even if only for a few specific clusters.

    It’s not that big a deal that Sony did, or didn’t know who had clusters, the deal is that they do now. They could fix the problem with the press of a button.

    I wouldn’t be too surprised if they reversed the decision anyway. On one hand they have a lawsuit and on the other they have hackers, the very people Sony were trying to deter, modifying the firmware to allow the feature anyway. Apart from annoying the genuine users of the feature (and the customers who feel they should be entitled to use it although they may not want to), Sony currently seem to be gaining nothing from the move.

    • Kevin Schram

      Interesting idea, Dave. I can’t see them reinstalling the OtherOS feature but that’s a side I hadn’t heard before.

  • conundrum

    National security implications here, by breaking those clusters Sony has substantially harmed the USAF, NASA and other agencies and therefore by definition become an “enemy of the state” as defined by law.
    So arrest those idiots responsible and send them right to Gitmo.

    #include “$0.02h”

    • Kevin Schram

      @conundrum

      LOL, funny idea.

      As some others pointed out, I misinterpreted the story a bit, and they aren’t breaking the clusters per say.

      Still, funny point.

      Thanks to those who politely pointed out that I had confused Hot Hardware’s point.