NVIDIA Replies To AMD's Claims Of Cash Bribes On PhysX

NVIDIA Says They Do Not Force Developers To Use PhysX, Nor Do They Bribe Them With Cash Incentives

AMD Senior Manager Richard Huddy drew some headlines last week when he boldly said that developers only included PhysX in their games was because “they’re paid to do it.” Huddy, who handles developer relations for AMD, went on a considerable rant saying that most developers don’t care to use NVIDIA PhysX technology – and that they only included it because of the cash incentives and marketing that NVIDIA provides. Now, NVIDIA fires back.

NVIDIA’s director of developer relations, Ashutosh Rege, sat down with xbitlabs.com and replied to AMD and Mr. Huddy’s claims that NVIDIA pays developers to use PhysX middleware. “There could be no deal under which we would cash somebody in for using PhysX,” Rege says. Rege points out that the physics engines of a game title must be decided long before development on the game begins – so it would be impossible for NVIDIA come in and bribe developers to add PhysX at the last minute.

Rege does admit that NVIDIA offers support to developers who choose to use PhysX. “We will, of course, help them to do that; we will help them with engineering and we will help them even with artists, who also go on-site and spend a lot of time with their artists to [help creating content]. Adding GPU PhysX to a game is a lot more different than adding just general physics effects. There is more work than adding post-processing effects.”

Rege also admits that NVIDIA does help game developers with marketing for the 15 or so PC game titles that offer enhanced physics processing if one has a NVIDIA graphics card. Rege replied to claims that NVIDIA purposely works with developers to ‘lockout’ performance on ATI card for certain PC games that are marketed with the “NVIDIA: The Way It’s Meant To Be Played” tag line. “What we do when we add GPU PhysX engagement with the developer is that in no shape or form we do anything harmful for the rest of the platforms, those that do not support GPU PhysX. It is just an additive value to our GeForce customers and eventually it boosts game experience on the PC,” Rege said.

ATI and NVIDIA are certainly locked in a heated rivalry for graphics card dollars, and there certainly is a lot of tension between the two companies.

Credit: Source.
Related Stories on TFTS:
  • Nvidia & Microsoft Look To Get Tegra 3 Hardware To Developers

    Microsoft Making A Big Push To Get Developers In On Windows 8, Working With Nvidia To Get Tegra 3-Powered Gear To The Software Folks

  • iPhone a More Lucrative Business Than Android for Google?

    Report Claims iOS Brings In Four Times More Cash Than Android, But Is Just Cash Google Is After?

  • Are Japanese Developers Abandoning PS Vita?

    Nikkei Claims PS Vita Developers Are Jumping Ship, Sony Responds To Speculation

  • Apple Says That Apple A5X Is Four Times Faster Than Tegra 3, NVIDIA Wants To Know How

    NVIDIA PR Responds To Apple's Claims That The New iPad HD Will Be 4x Times Faster Than T3 Android Tablets

  • UK Regulators Now Investigating Apple's 4G iPad Claims

    Following An Investigation Of Apple's 4G Claims In Australia, The Movement Expands To The UK, Where Investigators Are Also Checking Up

  • Tim Cook Admits That Apple Has Too Much Cash

    Apple Finally Admits Their Cash Reserves Are Huge, Investors Push For Apple To Issue Dividends



  • Comments are closed.