<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Apple Refusing to Repair Macs if You Smoke? [Apple Allegedly Claiming Tobacco Smoke Inside Macs is a &#039;Biohazard&#039;]</title> <atom:link href="http://nexus404.com/Blog/2009/11/22/apple-refusing-to-repair-macs-if-you-smoke-apple-allegedly-claiming-tobacco-smoke-inside-macs-is-a-biohazard/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://nexus404.com/Blog/2009/11/22/apple-refusing-to-repair-macs-if-you-smoke-apple-allegedly-claiming-tobacco-smoke-inside-macs-is-a-biohazard/</link> <description>TFTS - the very latest in technology news, new gadgets and gizmos. From HDTVs to netbooks, cell phones, DSLR cameras, PMPs, DAPs.</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 22:52:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Apple Refuses To Fix Smoke-Damaged Macs &#124; 101TECHREVIEW.co.cc</title><link>http://nexus404.com/Blog/2009/11/22/apple-refusing-to-repair-macs-if-you-smoke-apple-allegedly-claiming-tobacco-smoke-inside-macs-is-a-biohazard/#comment-43847</link> <dc:creator>Apple Refuses To Fix Smoke-Damaged Macs &#124; 101TECHREVIEW.co.cc</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 16:42:19 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://nexus404.com/Blog/?p=23263#comment-43847</guid> <description>[...] Via1, Via2 [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Via1, Via2 [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Apple Refuses To Fix Smoke-Damaged Macs</title><link>http://nexus404.com/Blog/2009/11/22/apple-refusing-to-repair-macs-if-you-smoke-apple-allegedly-claiming-tobacco-smoke-inside-macs-is-a-biohazard/#comment-43768</link> <dc:creator>Apple Refuses To Fix Smoke-Damaged Macs</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 19:18:55 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://nexus404.com/Blog/?p=23263#comment-43768</guid> <description>[...] Via1, Via2 [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Via1, Via2 [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Andrew Tingle</title><link>http://nexus404.com/Blog/2009/11/22/apple-refusing-to-repair-macs-if-you-smoke-apple-allegedly-claiming-tobacco-smoke-inside-macs-is-a-biohazard/#comment-43591</link> <dc:creator>Andrew Tingle</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 15:17:05 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://nexus404.com/Blog/?p=23263#comment-43591</guid> <description>For my sins I smoke (I know, I know) and even I see the points you raise above as being valid ones. I think I&#039;m going to move this disgusting habit outside from now on - it&#039;ll will help me to wind things down as I&#039;ve got to the stage now where I want to quit.Interestingly my last computer blew its processor (it was quite a pop) - related, perhaps? I&#039;ve still got it (though its dead - I just cannot bring myself to get rid of it) so I&#039;m going to take a look at its internals...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For my sins I smoke (I know, I know) and even I see the points you raise above as being valid ones. I think I&#8217;m going to move this disgusting habit outside from now on &#8211; it&#8217;ll will help me to wind things down as I&#8217;ve got to the stage now where I want to quit.</p><p>Interestingly my last computer blew its processor (it was quite a pop) &#8211; related, perhaps? I&#8217;ve still got it (though its dead &#8211; I just cannot bring myself to get rid of it) so I&#8217;m going to take a look at its internals&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: matthew</title><link>http://nexus404.com/Blog/2009/11/22/apple-refusing-to-repair-macs-if-you-smoke-apple-allegedly-claiming-tobacco-smoke-inside-macs-is-a-biohazard/#comment-43589</link> <dc:creator>matthew</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 14:58:09 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://nexus404.com/Blog/?p=23263#comment-43589</guid> <description>I&#039;ve worked in geek-squad-like tech support positions before and have seen several cigarette-smoke-induced system failures.The tar in the cigarette smoke mixes with the normal dust in the air which is blown through the heatsinks in the system. The tar/dust mixture collects in the heatsinks and around the fan blades causing the air flow to become blocked and the fans to be clogged.Overheating can cause severe damage to the components and the tar mixture will also cause the fan motor to blow out.At the company I worked for, we&#039;d require a system cleaning prior to servicing these cigarette smoke clogged systems regardless of the nature of the repair. And if the fan was burned out we&#039;d require a hardware diagnosis and repair charge to replace the fan. The cleaning charge was around $30 and the hardware diag/repair charge was around $100.And this doesn&#039;t take into account the horrible smells we&#039;d deal with cleaning these dirty boxes. But because we weren&#039;t bound by warranty in any way in these services, and if it was a warranty repair such damage easily fell under a standard physical damage clause, I never had a qualm about the extra charges for service.Let&#039;s just say I can understand why Apple does this, but if I were making the decision at Apple, I&#039;d call it physical damage rather than an environmental hazard.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve worked in geek-squad-like tech support positions before and have seen several cigarette-smoke-induced system failures.</p><p>The tar in the cigarette smoke mixes with the normal dust in the air which is blown through the heatsinks in the system. The tar/dust mixture collects in the heatsinks and around the fan blades causing the air flow to become blocked and the fans to be clogged.</p><p>Overheating can cause severe damage to the components and the tar mixture will also cause the fan motor to blow out.</p><p>At the company I worked for, we&#8217;d require a system cleaning prior to servicing these cigarette smoke clogged systems regardless of the nature of the repair. And if the fan was burned out we&#8217;d require a hardware diagnosis and repair charge to replace the fan. The cleaning charge was around $30 and the hardware diag/repair charge was around $100.</p><p>And this doesn&#8217;t take into account the horrible smells we&#8217;d deal with cleaning these dirty boxes. But because we weren&#8217;t bound by warranty in any way in these services, and if it was a warranty repair such damage easily fell under a standard physical damage clause, I never had a qualm about the extra charges for service.</p><p>Let&#8217;s just say I can understand why Apple does this, but if I were making the decision at Apple, I&#8217;d call it physical damage rather than an environmental hazard.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 225/226 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via Tftscdn.nexus404.com

Served from: nexus404.com @ 2012-02-14 22:09:31 -->
