<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Apple Applies for Ad-Supported OS Patent [Apple Future Mac OS Available for Free; Advertisements to Run in the Background?]</title> <atom:link href="http://nexus404.com/Blog/2009/10/23/apple-applies-for-ad-supported-os-patent-apple-future-mac-os-available-for-free-advertisements-to-run-in-the-background/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://nexus404.com/Blog/2009/10/23/apple-applies-for-ad-supported-os-patent-apple-future-mac-os-available-for-free-advertisements-to-run-in-the-background/</link> <description>TFTS - the very latest in technology news, new gadgets and gizmos. From HDTVs to netbooks, cell phones, DSLR cameras, PMPs, DAPs.</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 22:52:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Patrick</title><link>http://nexus404.com/Blog/2009/10/23/apple-applies-for-ad-supported-os-patent-apple-future-mac-os-available-for-free-advertisements-to-run-in-the-background/#comment-41619</link> <dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 13:44:55 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://nexus404.com/Blog/?p=22213#comment-41619</guid> <description>Didn&#039;t Microsoft try a similar approach years ago with like Windows 95 or 98? Users won&#039;t stand for it and futhermore Apple needs to wake up and realize its not 1990 and their product line isn&#039;t so much better than any other OS or hardware. (Especially now w/ Intel based Mac&#039;s). In reality this is a good thing. Now I won&#039;t have to push Linux so hard. With most Linux distros being free what is the point of paying for the hardware, OS (or get ads), and still have to pay for third party software?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Didn&#8217;t Microsoft try a similar approach years ago with like Windows 95 or 98? Users won&#8217;t stand for it and futhermore Apple needs to wake up and realize its not 1990 and their product line isn&#8217;t so much better than any other OS or hardware. (Especially now w/ Intel based Mac&#8217;s). In reality this is a good thing. Now I won&#8217;t have to push Linux so hard. With most Linux distros being free what is the point of paying for the hardware, OS (or get ads), and still have to pay for third party software?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 192/193 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via Tftscdn.nexus404.com

Served from: nexus404.com @ 2012-02-15 02:07:25 -->
