<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Roland Edirol R-09HR MP3 Recorder/Player &#8211; A Major Contender For ‘Ugliest Gadget Of The Year’</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nexus404.com/Blog/2008/03/14/roland-edirol-r-09hr-mp3-player-ugliest-gadget-of-the-year/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nexus404.com/Blog/2008/03/14/roland-edirol-r-09hr-mp3-player-ugliest-gadget-of-the-year/</link>
	<description>TFTS - the very latest in technology news, new gadgets and gizmos. From HDTVs to netbooks, cell phones, DSLR cameras, PMPs, DAPs.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 20:22:58 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Tingle</title>
		<link>http://nexus404.com/Blog/2008/03/14/roland-edirol-r-09hr-mp3-player-ugliest-gadget-of-the-year/comment-page-1/#comment-25790</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Tingle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 23:21:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nexus404.com/Blog/2008/03/14/roland-edirol-r-09hr-mp3-player-ugliest-gadget-of-the-year/#comment-25790</guid>
		<description>Hi David,

Many thanks for taking the time to offer your opinion and first hand experience of the R-09HR (you certainly have not wasted your time :-) ).

The device appears to have some very loyal users so must be good, and whilst personally the design does nothing for me, from an aesthetic standpoint, I accept that beauty is very much in the eye of the beholder. The comparison made with the Gigabit was on the basis of &#039;looks&#039; only though, I must now accept that this is obviously not clear.

I would be more than happy to add your feelings and insight to the main body of the post as it may help others and to this end I would love to hear back from you to see if that&#039;s ok (I&#039;ll credit you, naturally).

I&#039;ll pop you a mail just in case you don&#039;t come by to read this response.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi David,</p>
<p>Many thanks for taking the time to offer your opinion and first hand experience of the R-09HR (you certainly have not wasted your time <img src='http://nexus404.com/Blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  ).</p>
<p>The device appears to have some very loyal users so must be good, and whilst personally the design does nothing for me, from an aesthetic standpoint, I accept that beauty is very much in the eye of the beholder. The comparison made with the Gigabit was on the basis of &#8216;looks&#8217; only though, I must now accept that this is obviously not clear.</p>
<p>I would be more than happy to add your feelings and insight to the main body of the post as it may help others and to this end I would love to hear back from you to see if that&#8217;s ok (I&#8217;ll credit you, naturally).</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll pop you a mail just in case you don&#8217;t come by to read this response.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: david</title>
		<link>http://nexus404.com/Blog/2008/03/14/roland-edirol-r-09hr-mp3-player-ugliest-gadget-of-the-year/comment-page-1/#comment-25783</link>
		<dc:creator>david</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 21:12:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nexus404.com/Blog/2008/03/14/roland-edirol-r-09hr-mp3-player-ugliest-gadget-of-the-year/#comment-25783</guid>
		<description>Just thought to write after coming across this posting about the R-09HR:

First of all, I own one, so I can say first hand a few things about it.

As far as design taste goes, everyone&#039;s entitled to their own, and for that matter
I don&#039;t particularly find the R-09 ugly, it looks pretty slick and classy, especially
in my hands. 

Secondly, I think it&#039;s quite wrong what you posted above about the R-09.
To compare it to the Toshiba MP3 player really shows that you&#039;ve clearly
missed the point with it. A bit like comparing a mobile phone to a walkie talkie!
This isn&#039;t an MP3 player, ipod style, its a high quality handheld recorder.
The fact that Roland are marketing it as HR standing for High Resolution, 24 Bits 9600 Wav resolution goes to show that&#039;s what it&#039;s made for. 

I&#039;m not from Roland, but I just think this post doesn&#039;t do it any justice, because
I use the R-09 to record really professional stuff, all the way from live performances, to pots and pans around the house to use in my own productions.
Its a fab field recorder. The built in mics rock!  And all music tech mags seem
to second that...

Let&#039;s just hope this gets posted and I didnt waste my time!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just thought to write after coming across this posting about the R-09HR:</p>
<p>First of all, I own one, so I can say first hand a few things about it.</p>
<p>As far as design taste goes, everyone&#8217;s entitled to their own, and for that matter<br />
I don&#8217;t particularly find the R-09 ugly, it looks pretty slick and classy, especially<br />
in my hands. </p>
<p>Secondly, I think it&#8217;s quite wrong what you posted above about the R-09.<br />
To compare it to the Toshiba MP3 player really shows that you&#8217;ve clearly<br />
missed the point with it. A bit like comparing a mobile phone to a walkie talkie!<br />
This isn&#8217;t an MP3 player, ipod style, its a high quality handheld recorder.<br />
The fact that Roland are marketing it as HR standing for High Resolution, 24 Bits 9600 Wav resolution goes to show that&#8217;s what it&#8217;s made for. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m not from Roland, but I just think this post doesn&#8217;t do it any justice, because<br />
I use the R-09 to record really professional stuff, all the way from live performances, to pots and pans around the house to use in my own productions.<br />
Its a fab field recorder. The built in mics rock!  And all music tech mags seem<br />
to second that&#8230;</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s just hope this gets posted and I didnt waste my time!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Tingle</title>
		<link>http://nexus404.com/Blog/2008/03/14/roland-edirol-r-09hr-mp3-player-ugliest-gadget-of-the-year/comment-page-1/#comment-24464</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Tingle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 15:23:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nexus404.com/Blog/2008/03/14/roland-edirol-r-09hr-mp3-player-ugliest-gadget-of-the-year/#comment-24464</guid>
		<description>Hi Ian, thanks for the feedback.

As I understood it the device does also serve as an MP3 player though, I accept its primary function as as a recorder - which is why I made mention of its recording capabilities (though perhaps I should have made greater emphasis of this, so point very much taken). We&#039;ll adapt the post title in light of your feedback. :-)

You don&#039;t&#039; like the new Sony devices then (even the new models)?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ian, thanks for the feedback.</p>
<p>As I understood it the device does also serve as an MP3 player though, I accept its primary function as as a recorder &#8211; which is why I made mention of its recording capabilities (though perhaps I should have made greater emphasis of this, so point very much taken). We&#8217;ll adapt the post title in light of your feedback. <img src='http://nexus404.com/Blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>You don&#8217;t&#8217; like the new Sony devices then (even the new models)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Kemmish</title>
		<link>http://nexus404.com/Blog/2008/03/14/roland-edirol-r-09hr-mp3-player-ugliest-gadget-of-the-year/comment-page-1/#comment-24463</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Kemmish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 15:15:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nexus404.com/Blog/2008/03/14/roland-edirol-r-09hr-mp3-player-ugliest-gadget-of-the-year/#comment-24463</guid>
		<description>Except that it&#039;s NOT an MP3 player.  It&#039;s an MP3 RECORDER with a built-in (and pretty reasonable) stereo microphone, which is an entirely different thing.  I&#039;ve been using a vanilla R-09 for about a year for my harpsichord practice, and it&#039;s one of the best purchases i have ever made.

Strangely enough I don&#039;t much care what it looks like.  However, since the only other affordable portable MP3 recorder on the market, from Sony,  has more superfluous chrome than a T-bird, I&#039;d say Roland did a reasonable job on this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Except that it&#8217;s NOT an MP3 player.  It&#8217;s an MP3 RECORDER with a built-in (and pretty reasonable) stereo microphone, which is an entirely different thing.  I&#8217;ve been using a vanilla R-09 for about a year for my harpsichord practice, and it&#8217;s one of the best purchases i have ever made.</p>
<p>Strangely enough I don&#8217;t much care what it looks like.  However, since the only other affordable portable MP3 recorder on the market, from Sony,  has more superfluous chrome than a T-bird, I&#8217;d say Roland did a reasonable job on this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
