Roland Edirol R-09HR MP3 Recorder/Player – A Major Contender For ‘Ugliest Gadget Of The Year’

Posted by Andrew Tingle on March 14th 2008 | 4 Responses

Roland Edirol R-09HR MP3 Player

Here we are but three months into the year (at the time of writing) and already we have what we suspect to be the ugliest gadget of ’08 staring us in firmly the face in the form of this truly grotesque Roland Edirol R-09HR MP3 Recorder/Player (which, we should stress, is primarily intended to serve as MP3 recorder – thanks Ian).

Sporting a design that manages to fuse all the worst elements of gadgets long since assigned to the electrostatically charged gadget heaven in the sky to the extent that it makes the world’s first Walkman look positively futuristic, the Roland Edirol R-09HR MP3 Player’s highlights (yes, it has some redeeming features, as do we all) include linear PCM 24bit/96kHz quality recording capabilities, a wireless remote control (thus allowing you to control the player while it’s tucked out of sight), 10 stage variable playback and an integrated speaker.

No information concerning pricing or availability have been released at the time of writing though, personally, we’d much rather opt for Toshiba’s Gigabit U Series MP3 Player (and, trust me, that’s really saying something – shiver).

Roland Japan [via Dvice]

Looking for more? See Audio,Visual | Mp3 Players & PMPs or scroll down for carefully selected related items that may also be of interest to you.

Roland Edirol R-09HR MP3 Recorder/Player - A Major Contender For ‘Ugliest Gadget Of The Year’

4 Responses/Trackbacks concerning
“Roland Edirol R-09HR MP3 Recorder/Player – A Major Contender For ‘Ugliest Gadget Of The Year’”

RESPONSES

Response by Ian Kemmish | March 15th, 2008 at 3:15 am

Except that it’s NOT an MP3 player. It’s an MP3 RECORDER with a built-in (and pretty reasonable) stereo microphone, which is an entirely different thing. I’ve been using a vanilla R-09 for about a year for my harpsichord practice, and it’s one of the best purchases i have ever made.

Strangely enough I don’t much care what it looks like. However, since the only other affordable portable MP3 recorder on the market, from Sony, has more superfluous chrome than a T-bird, I’d say Roland did a reasonable job on this.
Response by Andrew Tingle | March 15th, 2008 at 3:23 am

Hi Ian, thanks for the feedback.

As I understood it the device does also serve as an MP3 player though, I accept its primary function as as a recorder – which is why I made mention of its recording capabilities (though perhaps I should have made greater emphasis of this, so point very much taken). We’ll adapt the post title in light of your feedback.

You don’t’ like the new Sony devices then (even the new models)?
Response by david | April 23rd, 2008 at 10:12 pm

Just thought to write after coming across this posting about the R-09HR:

First of all, I own one, so I can say first hand a few things about it.

As far as design taste goes, everyone’s entitled to their own, and for that matter
I don’t particularly find the R-09 ugly, it looks pretty slick and classy, especially
in my hands.

Secondly, I think it’s quite wrong what you posted above about the R-09.
To compare it to the Toshiba MP3 player really shows that you’ve clearly
missed the point with it. A bit like comparing a mobile phone to a walkie talkie!
This isn’t an MP3 player, ipod style, its a high quality handheld recorder.
The fact that Roland are marketing it as HR standing for High Resolution, 24 Bits 9600 Wav resolution goes to show that’s what it’s made for.

I’m not from Roland, but I just think this post doesn’t do it any justice, because
I use the R-09 to record really professional stuff, all the way from live performances, to pots and pans around the house to use in my own productions.
Its a fab field recorder. The built in mics rock! And all music tech mags seem
to second that…

Let’s just hope this gets posted and I didnt waste my time!
Response by Andrew Tingle | April 24th, 2008 at 12:21 am

Hi David,

Many thanks for taking the time to offer your opinion and first hand experience of the R-09HR (you certainly have not wasted your time ).

The device appears to have some very loyal users so must be good, and whilst personally the design does nothing for me, from an aesthetic standpoint, I accept that beauty is very much in the eye of the beholder. The comparison made with the Gigabit was on the basis of ‘looks’ only though, I must now accept that this is obviously not clear.

I would be more than happy to add your feelings and insight to the main body of the post as it may help others and to this end I would love to hear back from you to see if that’s ok (I’ll credit you, naturally).

I’ll pop you a mail just in case you don’t come by to read this response.