An interesting site listing the top one hundred Wikipedia pages by views offers a fascinating insight into readership interests. As one would expect, pages related to sex or pornography are in clear evidence, but some of the other top 100 results are a little less predictable and rather intriguing.
Of the interesting entries in the chart it is interesting to note that the Irukandji Jellyfish comes in at number eleven, just above pornography (which is rather unexpected). It is also interesting to note that Pokemon slots in at number sixteen, just above the events of 9/11.
The US Airforce will, I am sure, be ecstatic that they are one slot above Batman but only two slots above a list of gay porn stars, though Disney will not be as happy to find that a list of their characters comes in two places below this. George Washington is at number 64, just below sex, whereas Mel Gibson, at number 69, is one above a search of aliens at 69 – which seems fair enough to me.
Other odd linkages by place rankings are masturbation and Che Guevara, at 89 and 88 respectively, and Bob Dylan at 72 – one below Spiderman.
Unsurprisingly, a list of big-busted models and performers sits at number four.
You can view the top one hundred Wikipedia pages by page views, and see some of the curious juxtapositions for yourself, by clicking here.
If you found this interesting, you may also like these pages.
Linked Externally? Click here to return to main site or click here to go directly to the post archive – see what you’ve been missing
.
Related Reading on TFTS
4 Responses/Trackbacks concerning
“Wikipedia Top 100 Pages by Views”
TRACKBACKS FROM OTHER SITES

RESPONSES
I am going to have to visit this link more often. I like to see rankings such as these.
Keep in mind that pages that edit wars will drive up the number of pageviews.
Er. Sorry, should have proofread. What I meant was, the list doesn’t just indicate which pages are of the greatest general interest to outsiders; it’s also skewed by wikipedians’ internal edit conflicts (and, of course, most of these views are probably incoming links from search engines, which probably tilts the results in a complex way)
Ah, I see, thank you sincerely for the clarification wikipediablog